Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Women and girls need to be safe
access_time 2021-01-15T15:08:45+05:30
Another Trump impeachment
access_time 2021-01-15T11:16:29+05:30
Covid 19 spread
access_time 2021-01-14T15:40:30+05:30
Freezing the Centre or the farmer protest?
access_time 2021-01-14T12:55:08+05:30
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
Anti-Conversion Law: A law meant for abuse
access_time 2021-01-12T13:56:35+05:30
Syed Shahriyaar
access_time 2021-01-05T19:08:46+05:30
Reading A week in the life of Svitlana
access_time 2020-12-23T12:06:42+05:30
Hum Dekhenge- One year of Anti-CAA protests
access_time 2020-12-22T17:35:06+05:30
The French Fanatic and the Fanatic Fringe
access_time 2020-11-02T15:56:00+05:30
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightBusinesschevron_rightBids of Jindal Power,...

Bids of Jindal Power, Balco rejected for four coal blocks

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bids of Jindal Power, Balco rejected for four coal blocks
cancel

New Delhi: The government has decided not to accept the bids made for four coal blocks but decided to go ahead with five others that were among those put to scrutiny following the two rounds of e-auctions conducted for 33 mines over February and March this year.

"Government takes decision on bids for nine coal blocks after examination. Bids for five blocks accepted," Coal Secretary Anil Swarup tweeted. Bids for Gare Palma 4/1, 4/2, 4/3 and Tara coal blocks not accepted," he said, referring to the four blocks.

Jindal Power had made the highest bid for Tara coal block that was on the table during the March auction, while Balco did so for Gare Palma 4/1 during February. Jindal Power was also the highest bidder for Gare Palma 4/2 and 4/3 blocks. All these blocks are in Chhattisgarh.

Five of the nine blocks that were examined belong to the Schedule III category that are near operational, while the four others are listed under Schedule II that were already operational, according to a coal ministry official.

Reacting to the decision, Jindal Power said it failed to understand the reason for rejection that "the highest bidder doesn't reflect fair value" and further that it had followed a consistent and prudent bidding strategy throughout the auction process as a serious long term player.

"We are puzzled with the decision and would make our best efforts to engage in a dialogue with the coal ministry and government authorities to present the facts," the company said in a statement.

The coal ministry official said they considered whether these bids were too low when compared with the winning bids for other similar blocks via an analytical tool called "outlier" that looked for unusual patterns that are far removed from the mass of data.

"Not making any allegation of cartelisation as of now," Secretary Swarup had tweeted following the decision on examination, and told reporters later: "We are looking at whether the price that was quoted is good enough for the government or not, and whether we could get a better price".

Listing the options before the government, should the bids be rejected, he said the government could re-auction the mines, allot them to the states or even hand them over to the state-run Coal India.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story