Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Democracy that banks on the electorate
access_time 28 March 2024 5:34 AM GMT
Lessons to learn from Moscow terror attack
access_time 27 March 2024 6:10 AM GMT
Gaza
access_time 26 March 2024 4:34 AM GMT
The poison is not in words, but inside
access_time 25 March 2024 5:42 AM GMT
A witchhunt, plain and simple
access_time 23 March 2024 9:35 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Ramadan: Its essence and lessons
access_time 13 March 2024 9:24 AM GMT
When ‘Jai Sree Ram’ becomes a death call
access_time 15 Feb 2024 9:54 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightBombay HC refuses...

Bombay HC refuses interim relief to Raj Kundra in pornography case

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bombay HC refuses interim relief to Raj Kundra in pornography case
cancel

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court Tuesday on Tuesday refused to grant interim relief to businessman Raj Kundra, husband of actor Shilpa Shetty who applied for bail in porn producing case. His bail plea claimed that his arrest was illegal, as per a Live Law report.

A bench headed by Justice A.S. Gadkari said that he could not grant him any relief without hearing the prosecution. He also asked the police to file its reply to Kundra's petition by July 29.

Soon after his arrest, Kundra, through his lawyer Abad Ponda, moved the Bombay HC challenging his arrest and seeking to quash the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's July 20 order and all subsequent orders remanding him to police custody.

Earlier on Tuesday, the lower court sent him to 14 days of judicial custody till August 10 and he has now filed a bail plea which is likely to come up for hearing on Wednesday.

In his petition before the high court, Kundra - husband of Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty - contended that the alleged content does not depict any explicit sexual acts or intercourse but show only material in the form of short films.

Ponda also argued that Kundra's arrest was "illegal" since he was not served with proper advance notice of appearance under Section 41A of the CrPC and instead arrested under the garb of recording his statement.

However, Pai argued that the Mumbai Police had served the relevant notice which Ponda termed as a mere formality given post-arrest.

Kundra has been charged with offences under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the IT Act, and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.

Ponda pointed out that Kundra has been charged with only two offences which are bailable and carry a maximum jail term of 7 years for which a notice under Section 41A was required.

The police said that raids on Kundra's office on July 19 led to the recovery of pornographic videos related to the HotShot app, developed by his brother-in-law and UK national Pradeep Bakshi after which he was asked to appear before the Crime Branch vide the notice under Section 41A, but Kundra refused to sign it.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Bombay High CourtRaj Kundra casepornography case
Next Story