Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Israel
access_time 16 April 2024 5:09 AM GMT
Peoples priority is livelihood issues
access_time 12 April 2024 4:30 AM GMT
The survival challenge before the CPM
access_time 10 April 2024 5:05 AM GMT
NATO
access_time 9 April 2024 4:00 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Ramadan: Its essence and lessons
access_time 13 March 2024 9:24 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightDelhi Court takes...

Delhi Court takes cognizance of Republic TV's defamation complaint against Times Now anchor

text_fields
bookmark_border
Navika Kumar, Arnab
cancel
camera_alt

Arnab Goswami and Navika Kumar/Image : File Photo

New Delhi: A Delhi court has taken cognizance of the defamation complaint filed by the parent company of the Republic TV against Times Now anchor Navika Kumar.

The complaint filed by ARG Outlier Media Private Limited,the parent company of the Republic TV alleges that Times Now anchor Navika Kumar made defamatory remarks on her show on January 18 against Republic TV and its founder in connection with the alleged WhatsApp chats mentioned in the charge sheet filed by the Mumbai Police in the TRP scam case.

"Navika Kumar made rabid and unfounded claims accusing Republic Media Network's founder of endangering national security and leaking state secrets, thereby jeopardising the goodwill of the network and endangering the entire organisation," the 49-page complaint stated.

The company submitted that the defamatory show had over 85,000 views in addition to the live telecast at prime time in the satellite television, and "the scale of defamation faced by the complainant company is irreparable".

The ARG Outlier Media Private Limited also went on to say that the accused is jealous and the lack of ability of the accused to match the success of the complainant's company has caused this defamatory show to be aired.

The complainant emphasised that Navika Kumar cannot be permitted to steal a march over the adjudication process and pronounce someone guilt by elevating itself a parallel adjudication forum as the trial has yet not begun.

The company had requested the court to take cognisance of the complaint and give punishment to the accused in accordance with the law for the commission of offence under Sections 499 (defamation) and 500 (Punishment for defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Chander Jit Singh took cognizance and slated the matter to June 8 for pre-summoning evidence.

(From IANS with edits)

Show Full Article
TAGS:#Republic TVdefamationTimes now
Next Story