Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
May that spark not be extinguished
access_time 2 Dec 2023 8:55 AM GMT
A Constitution always in the making
access_time 27 Nov 2023 11:43 AM GMT
Debunking myth of Israel’s existence
access_time 23 Oct 2023 7:01 AM GMT
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightHindu outfits...

Hindu outfits petitions for survey of Bhopal's Jama Masjid: claims to be temple

Hindu outfits petitions for survey of Bhopals Jama Masjid: claims to be temple

Bhopal: While headlines are being made on the Varanasi Gyanvapi mosque case, a similar 'temple vs mosque' issue is on the rise in Madhya Pradesh surrounding 19th century Jama Masjid located in Bhopal's Chowk Bazar area.

Claims have been raised by the Sanskriti Bachao Manch, a right-wing outfit that the Jama Masjid was built on top of a Shiva temple.

Headed by Chandrashekhar Tiwari, the Sanskriti Bachao Manch submitted a memorandum asking for a detailed survey of the Jama Masjid.

The issue gained momentum after a group of right-wing activists on Thursday met the state Home Minister Narottam Mishra and drew the state government's attention to this matter.

Tiwari said that he is preparing to file a petition in the local court over the issue in the coming days.

"We have demanded a detailed archaeological survey of the Jama Masjid by the state government. We will also file a petition in the court seeking a survey and excavation to bare the history of the mosque built over a temple called 'Sabha Mandap'," Tiwari told the press after meeting Mishra on Thursday.

Tiwari said that he has raised demands for the survey on the basis of facts collected in Hayate-I-Qudsi (a book on Bhopal's first woman ruler Nawab Qudsia Begum). The empress (1819-1832) built the Jama Masjid and Gohar Mahal Palace in Bhopal.

"In the book on her life, Nawab Qudsia Begum mentioned that the work on building the Jama Masjid in Bhopal began in 1832 and was completed in 1857. It is also clearly mentioned that the mosque was built on the same land where a Hindu temple known as 'Sabha Mandap' already existed," Tiwari claimed.

Notably, the same issue has been raised by another right-wing outfit called the 'Hindu Dharma Sena'.

However, this is not the only a 'temple vs. mosque' dispute in Madhya Pradesh that is being debated these days. Earlier this month, an organisation called the 'Hindu Front for Justice' filed a PIL in the high court claiming that the Bhojshala monument located in Dhar district belongs to the Hindu community.

A PIL was filed challenging the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) order of 2003, which imposed restriction on Hindus to worship at Bhojshala daily.

Subsequently, the Indore bench issued notices to the ASI, Centre and the MP government seeking their response on the matter.

Bhojshala is an ASI protected 11th century monument which Hindus claim is a temple of Vagdevi (Saraswati), while the Muslim community treats it as the Kamal Maula Mosque.

As per the arrangement made by ASI on April 7, 2003, Hindus perform puja on the premises every Tuesday, while Muslims offer namaz in the complex on Fridays.

"Only the members of the Hindu community have a fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution of India to perform puja and rituals at the place of goddess Vagdevi within the premises of Saraswati Sadan, commonly known as Bhojshala situated in Dhar," the petition claimed.

"Members of the Muslim community have no right to use any portion of the aforesaid property for any religious purposes," it added.

The petitioner also urged the court to direct the Centre to bring back the idol of goddess Saraswati from the museum in London, and re-establish the same within the Bhojshala complex.

The plea has cited that the then rulers of Dhar had installed the holy statue at Bhojshala in 1034 AD and it was taken to London in 1857 by the British.

One of the petitioners, Ashish Goyal, said, "We have now started fighting legally to reclaim our religious place. The court found our petition comprehensive and issued notice."

With inputs from IANS

Show Full Article
Next Story