Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The disillusionment of the saffron brigades
access_time 27 April 2024 4:43 AM GMT
The pro-Palestine protests on American campuses
access_time 26 April 2024 4:00 AM GMT
Let Kerala set the direction for the country
access_time 25 April 2024 5:24 AM GMT
Here is what Modi juggernaut cannot understand
access_time 24 April 2024 5:07 AM GMT
Warnings in the Human Development Index
access_time 23 April 2024 12:47 PM GMT
Rule of law and law-breaking nations
access_time 22 April 2024 4:06 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Ramadan: Its essence and lessons
access_time 13 March 2024 9:24 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMaha govt's appeal of...

Maha govt's appeal of HC order to stay probe into Goswami's 'inflammatory' comments to be heard by SC on Monday

text_fields
bookmark_border
Maha govts appeal of HC order to stay probe into Goswamis inflammatory comments to be heard by SC on Monday
cancel

New Delhi: The Bombay High Court's 2020 judgement suspending the investigation into two FIRs filed against Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami for allegedly making inflammatory remarks is being challenged by the Maharashtra government in a case that the Supreme Court is set to hear on Monday.

According to the FIRs, Goswami made remarks about the Palghar lynching incident and how migrants gathered in huge numbers in Mumbai's Bandra neighbourhood during the Covid-induced curfew.

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli will hear the appeal filed by the Maharashtra government.

On October 26, 2020, the top court observed that some people are targeted with "greater intensity" and need more protection.

The Maharashtra government, which was then ruled by Uddhav Thackeray-led Maha Vikas Aghadi, had opposed the high court's decision to stay the police probe against Goswami.

The top court had sought a response from Goswami and others on the appeal filed by the state government.

In its June 30, 2020 order, the high court noted that while Goswami's comments targeted Congress and its president, Sonia Gandhi, he did not make any statement that would cause public disharmony or incite violence between different religious groups.

Citing observations made by the Supreme Court that India's freedom will rest safely as long as journalists can speak to power without being chilled by a threat of reprisal, the high court had said in its order that free citizens cannot exist when the news media is chained to adhere to any one position.

While admitting for the final hearing of the petition filed by Goswami seeking to quash the two FIRs, the high court had directed the police not to take any coercive action until the disposal of the plea.

The one filed in Nagpur was about a news show aired on the channel on April 21 about the Palghar incident where two religious leaders and their driver were lynched.

The Pydhonie case followed a show aired by Republic TV on April 29 where Goswami had referred to migrants gathering near a mosque outside the Bandra railway terminus during the lockdown.


Show Full Article
TAGS:supreme court#Bombay HCArnab GoswamiMaharashtra Govt
Next Story