Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
exit_to_app
Why this silence when freedoms are taken away
access_time 2021-02-24T15:29:20+05:30
Towards a digital emergency?
access_time 2021-02-27T11:29:17+05:30
Is privatisation really good for India?
access_time 2021-02-26T15:06:44+05:30
A salutary judgement for democracy
access_time 2021-02-25T11:37:19+05:30
The slaughter of democracy in Puducherry
access_time 2021-02-24T11:27:21+05:30
DEEP READ
Towards a digital emergency?
access_time 2021-02-27T11:29:17+05:30
The slaughter of democracy in Puducherry
access_time 2021-02-24T11:27:21+05:30
Populist Fascism
access_time 2021-01-31T17:19:29+05:30
Media Freedom
access_time 2021-01-31T15:47:07+05:30
Sharjeel Imam
access_time 2021-01-30T15:19:40+05:30
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC adjourns plea...

SC adjourns plea challenging Mehbooba Mufti's detention to October 15

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC adjourns plea challenging Mehbooba Muftis detention to October 15
cancel
camera_alt

Jammu and Kashmir's former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti, Image credit: PTI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned a plea, challenging former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti's detention, filed by her daughter Iltija Mufti.

A bench of Justices SK Kaul & Hrishikesh Roy asked the Solicitor General to get instruction on the petition seeking amendment to the prayers sought in Iltija's habeas corpus petition, which is currently pending adjudication.

During the hearing the Srinagar District Magistrate, who passed the order of preventive detention of Mufti under the Public Safety Act, told the Court that the order was passed after "subjective satisfaction" of the detaining authority that it is necessary to detain Mufti so as to prevent her from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, LiveLaw reported.

Srinagar Magistrate said that all the incriminating materials and the detention order against Mufti were referred to an Advisory Board, consisting of a retired High Court Judge and two Principal District & Sessions Judges, for its opinion, which confirmed the order. The Magistrate submitted that the Supreme Court cannot on a review of the grounds of detention, substitute its own opinion for that of the authority.

The Magistrate, who questioned the maintainability of the habeas corpus plea filed by Iltija, also submitted that if the petitioner sought to invoke the writ jurisdiction, should have approached the Jammu and Kashmir High Court first.

Responding to the adjournment of the plea, Iltija tweeted:

Show Full Article
TAGS:Mufti Iltija Srinagar Jammu and Kashmir 
Next Story