Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The disillusionment of the saffron brigades
access_time 27 April 2024 4:43 AM GMT
The pro-Palestine protests on American campuses
access_time 26 April 2024 4:00 AM GMT
Let Kerala set the direction for the country
access_time 25 April 2024 5:24 AM GMT
Here is what Modi juggernaut cannot understand
access_time 24 April 2024 5:07 AM GMT
Warnings in the Human Development Index
access_time 23 April 2024 12:47 PM GMT
Rule of law and law-breaking nations
access_time 22 April 2024 4:06 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Ramadan: Its essence and lessons
access_time 13 March 2024 9:24 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC judge recuses...

SC judge recuses himself from hearing Umar Khalid's bail plea in UAPA case

text_fields
bookmark_border
Umar Khalid
cancel

New Delhi: Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra of the Supreme Court recused himself on Wednesday from hearing an appeal by former JNU student Umar Khalid seeking bail in a UAPA case relating to an alleged conspiracy behind the rioting here in February 2020.

Khalid's appeal contesting the Delhi High Court's ruling from October 18 of last year, which had denied his bail request in the case, was heard by a bench of Justices A S Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra.

"This will come before some other bench. There is some difficulty for my brother (Justice Mishra) to take up this matter," Justice Bopanna said at the outset, without assigning any reason for Justice Mishra's recusal.

Advocate Rajat Nair, appearing for the Delhi Police, told the bench that they have filed a counter affidavit but there is an objection shown by the apex court registry on it.

"There are certain portion of statements which we have extracted, that portion is in vernacular," he said, adding, "That statement itself is in vernacular," Nair said he also wants to file the relevant portion of the charge sheet filed in the case.

The bench, which posted the matter for hearing on August 17, said the counter affidavit be taken on record.

"The matter can't be taken up in this combination of the bench. Hence, list on August 17," the bench said.

On July 12, the Delhi Police had sought time to respond to Khalid's petition.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Khalid, had then said, "In a bail matter, what counter is to be filed. The man is inside for two years and 10 months." On May 18, the apex court had sought a response from the Delhi Police on Khalid's plea challenging the high court order refusing him bail in the case.

The high court in October last year had rejected his bail plea, saying he was in constant touch with other co-accused and allegations against him are prima facie true.

The high court had also said the actions of the accused prima facie qualified as a "terrorist act" under the anti-terror law UAPA.

Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and several others have been booked under the anti-terror law Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and provisions of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly being the "masterminds" of the February 2020 riots, which left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.

The violence had erupted during the protests against CAA and NRC.

Khalid, arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020, had sought bail on grounds that he neither had any criminal role in the violence nor any "conspiratorial connect" with any other accused in the case.

Before the high court, the Delhi Police had opposed the bail plea by Khalid, saying the speech delivered by him was “very calculated” and brought up issues like Babri Masjid, triple talaq, Kashmir, the alleged suppression of Muslims and Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC).


With PTI inputs

Show Full Article
TAGS:supreme courtUmar Khalid
Next Story