Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Going beyond birthday celebration
access_time 18 Sep 2020 6:05 AM GMT
Periyar@142-Revolutionary and Visionary
access_time 17 Sep 2020 11:57 AM GMT
The word of caution from the highest court
access_time 17 Sep 2020 6:31 AM GMT
access_time 16 Sep 2020 5:58 AM GMT
access_time 15 Sep 2020 6:19 AM GMT
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
The ogres in the mind
access_time 8 Sep 2020 11:27 AM GMT
Why worry about populism?
access_time 4 Sep 2020 9:51 AM GMT
Media mind-set towards minorities
access_time 15 July 2020 4:29 PM GMT
SC seeks response from Centre on plea challenging NCMEI Act

Supreme Court of India, Image courtesy:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to Centre and others on a PIL by BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay challenging the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutes (NCMEI) Act, 2004, which seeks determination of minority status by states on the basis of population for the purpose of administering educational institutions.

The petitioner argued that the rights of minorities in these states under Articles 29-30 is being siphoned off illegally to the majority community in the State because Centre has not notified them 'minority' under NCMEI Act.

The petitioner also urged the apex court to direct and declare that Section 2(f) of the National Commission for Minority Education Institution Act 2004, arbitrary, irrational and offends Articles 14, 15, 21, 29 and 30 of the Constitution hence void.

Upadhyay contended before a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose that the facts constituting cause of action accrued on January 6, 2005, when the Act came into effect and by using unbridled power under S. 2(f), Centre arbitrarily notified 5 communities viz. Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Parsee as minority at national level, it went against the spirit of TMA Pai ruling.

"Cause of action continues till date because followers of Judaism, Bahaism and Hinduism; who are real minorities in Ladakh, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, Manipur, cannot establish and administer educational institutions of their choice because of non-identification of 'minority' at State level, thus jeopardizing their basic rights guaranteed under Article 29-30," said the petition.

After a brief hearing on the matter the bench issued notice returnable in six weeks.

The petitioner contended that Muslims are in majority in Lakshadweep (96.58 per cent) and Kashmir (96 per cent) and there is significant population in Ladakh (44 per cent), Assam (34.20 per cent), West Bengal (27.5 per cent), Kerala (26.60 per cent), Uttar Pradesh (19.30 per cent) & Bihar (18 per cent); can establish & administer educational institutions of their choice.

"Christians are majority in Nagaland (88.10 per cent), Mizoram (87.16 per cent) and Meghalaya (74.59 per cent), and there is a significant of their population in Arunachal, Goa, Kerala, Manipur, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, can also establish & administer.

"Hindus are merely 1 per cent in Ladakh, 2.75 per cent in Mizoram, 2.77 per cent in Lakshadweep, 4 per cent in Kashmir, 8.74 per cent in Nagaland, 11.52 per cent in Meghalaya, 29 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh, 38.49 per cent in Punjab, 41.29 per cent in Manipur but Centre has not declared them 'minority', thus Hindus are not protected under Articles 29-30 and cannot establish & administer educational institution of their choice," contended the plea.

The petitioner prayed before the top court: "In alternative, direct and declare that followers of Judaism, Bahaism & Hinduism, who are minorities in Ladakh, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab and Manipur, can establish & administer educational institutions of their choice in spirit of the TMA Pai Ruling," .

Show Full Article
TAGS:Minority Commission BJP Ashwini Kerala 
Next Story