Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
It doesnt end with Rahul hounding
access_time 25 March 2023 4:20 AM GMT
20 years after the Iraq war
access_time 24 March 2023 8:50 AM GMT
Are  Khalistanists returning?
access_time 22 March 2023 5:12 AM GMT
Trading votes for higher rubber price?
access_time 21 March 2023 5:26 AM GMT
Unmuting democracy
access_time 20 March 2023 6:21 AM GMT
Womens Day: Building a digitally equal world
access_time 8 March 2023 4:38 AM GMT
Women must arise now and embrace equity
access_time 7 March 2023 10:52 AM GMT
The criminal case against Vladimir Putin
access_time 27 Feb 2023 9:46 AM GMT
Censorship that stifles free speech
access_time 24 Feb 2023 7:02 AM GMT
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right'Scandalous' remark on...

'Scandalous' remark on SC; lawyer writes to AG seeking action against Information Commissioner

Scandalous remark on SC; lawyer writes to AG seeking action against Information Commissioner

New Delhi: In a letter to the Attorney General of India, R. Venkataramani, Aldanish Rein, an Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India sought to initiate contempt of court proceedings against Information Commissioner Udhay Maharkar for allegedly making "scandalous" observations against the apex court.

In the Information Commissioner's observation while dealing with the second appeal of the case, All India Imam Organisation and/vs. Union of India and others, dated November 25, he said that by providing financial benefits from public treasury to only Imams and Muezzins in the mosques, the highest court of the country in passing this order violates the provisions of the Constitution, particularly Article 27, which says that the tax-payers money will not be used to favour any particular religion.

Further, the order stated that the said judgment set a wrong precedent in the country and "has become a point of unnecessary political slugfest and also social disharmony in the society."

The observation of the Information Commissioner, is on the grounds of the SC's judgement in which the top court had directed the Waqf board to provide remuneration to Imams who manage the mosques.

Mahurkar had made the remark while hearing an RTI application seeking details of salaries paid to Imams by the Delhi Waqf Board and Delhi government.

The Supreme Court (AOR) said the alleged contemnor, who is not even a law graduate to understand the nuances of law, went ahead and observed that the judgment passed by the two judges of the Supreme Court was passed in violation of the Constitution and set a wrong precedent.

Citing other observations in the order, Rein said the language adopted by the Information Commissioner is not only contemptuous but is also an attempt to disgrace the Muslim community and further spread disharmony among different communities on the strength of the Supreme Court order for some ulterior motives.

"The entire act of the alleged contemnor is a clear attempt to scandalise the Supreme Court and tends to lower the authority of the Supreme Court, therefore it is requested to grant consent in terms of Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate criminal contempt against the above alleged contemnor," said the letter.

-IANS Inputs

Show Full Article
TAGS:supreme court advocate general Waqf board information commissioner 
Next Story