UP passes ordinance against conversion for marriage, violators face up to 10 yrs in jail
text_fields
Lucknow: The Uttar Pradesh government on Tuesday approved a draft ordinance to deal with religious conversion for the sake of marriage, which could land violators in jail for up to 10 years.
An official spokesperson said the state Cabinet gave its nod to the ordinance at its meeting chaired here by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
In recent weeks, BJP-run states like Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Madhya Pradesh have revealed plans to enact laws to counter alleged attempts to convert Hindu women to Islam in the guise of marriage, which Hindu activists refer to as "love jihad".
"The way in which religious conversions are done using deceit, lies, force and dishonesty is heart wrenching, and it was necessary to have a law in this regard," Cabinet minister and UP government spokesperson Sidharth Nath Singh said.
He said punishment under the new law is a jail term from one and five years, and a fine of Rs 15,000.
But if the woman involved is a minor or belongs to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe, the jail term would range from three to 10 years, he said. The fine would increase to Rs 25,000.
"In the case of mass conversions, the punishment is from three years to 10 years and a fine of Rs 50,000 on the organisations which indulge in it," the minister told reporters.
Singh said if anyone wants to change religion after marriage, then he or she can do so.
But the district magistrate has to be informed two months in advance in a prescribed form, and the person can convert once permission is granted.
He claimed that this will resolve law and order problems.
Allahabad High Court had recently ruled that the right to live a with a person of one's choice is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty irrespective of religion.
A Bench of Justices Vivek Agarwal and Pankaj Naqvi said that its previous decisions stating that religious conversion per se for contracting a marriage was prohibited and said marriage has no sanctity in law were incorrect.
The court added that if an alleged conversion was under clout, the Constitutional Court was obliged to ascertain the wish and desire of the girls as they were above the age of 18 years.
