Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
It doesnt end with Rahul hounding
access_time 25 March 2023 4:20 AM GMT
20 years after the Iraq war
access_time 24 March 2023 8:50 AM GMT
Are  Khalistanists returning?
access_time 22 March 2023 5:12 AM GMT
Trading votes for higher rubber price?
access_time 21 March 2023 5:26 AM GMT
Unmuting democracy
access_time 20 March 2023 6:21 AM GMT
Womens Day: Building a digitally equal world
access_time 8 March 2023 4:38 AM GMT
Women must arise now and embrace equity
access_time 7 March 2023 10:52 AM GMT
The criminal case against Vladimir Putin
access_time 27 Feb 2023 9:46 AM GMT
Censorship that stifles free speech
access_time 24 Feb 2023 7:02 AM GMT
Homechevron_rightKeralachevron_rightGovt to go ahead with...

Govt to go ahead with Athirapally project

Govt to go ahead with Athirapally project

Thiruvananthapuram: The CPI(M)-led LDF government in Kerala Tuesday said it was not against the controversial Athirappilly hydro-electric project even as the Congress headed UDF vowed to oppose it tooth and nail.

The 163 MW project planned in the water resource bed of Chalakudy river in Thrissur district was pending for the past several years due to protest from environmentalists.

In a written reply in the Assembly, Power Minister Kadakampally Surendran said though there were stiff opposition from many quarters, the government plan was to implement the project after arriving at a consensus.

Speaking to reporters later, Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala, said the issue had been discussed by UDF and it had been decided to oppose the project unitedly.

"We are not prepared to go back on it even an inch. The ministers remarks that government will create a consensus and implement the project cannot be accepted," he said.

Since many opinions had emerged with regard to the project, Chennithala said he himself had visited the project site and had held discussions with the local people, tribals and environmental activists.

The majority view was that there was no need for the project, he said, adding costwise also it would not be profitable.

Environmentalists have claimed that about 140 hectares would be submerged if the project was implemented.

Show Full Article
Next Story