Chandy gets relief from court in solar scam case
text_fields
Bengaluru: In a relief to former Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, a city civil court Wednesday annulled its verdict directing six persons, including him and a firm to together pay Rs 1,60,85,700 in a case relating to the alleged solar scam.
The case will be heard afresh from June 1.
Judge N R Channakeshava gave the relief after the prosecution, during cross examination of Chandy, failed to establish that the defendant had made changes to the affidavit which it had received.
On January 2, the complainant in the case, case city- based businessman M K Kuruvilla, had sought time to study the affidavit, alleging it was different from the copy he had received.
Chandy had moved Additional City Civil and Sessions Court on October 24 last which had directed six persons, including him, and a firm together to pay Rs 1,60,85,700 to Kuruvilla with 12 per cent interest for a solar power project which did not materialise.
Chandy had filed two applications appealing against the earlier verdict.
The first had challenged the court's ex-parte order and the second sought that his arguments be heard.
On January 10, the court completed the cross-examination of Chandy after he had replied to several queries.
Kuruvilla had filed a civil petition in 2015 seeking return of Rs 1,60,85,700 deposited with SCOSSA Educational Consultants Private Limited for setting up a solar power project in Kerala.
According to Kuruvilla, in 2011, he got acquainted with one Binu Nair, who claimed to be Director of Kochi-based SCOSSA.
The petitioner had said that Nair had approached him for setting up the solar power project.
The petition stated that Nair had claimed that one of the directors of SCOSSA, Andrews, was Chandy s first cousin and would be appointed consultant to the project and that he would operate from Abu Dhabi.
Kuruvilla had also submitted that Nair had named one Diljith as another director of SCOSSA who, he claimed, was the private secretary to Chandy and contended that the former Chief Minister too was jointly liable to return his money.
