Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Farmer rage and Opposition parties
access_time 19 Sep 2020 6:51 AM GMT
access_time 19 Sep 2020 3:50 AM GMT
Going beyond birthday celebration
access_time 18 Sep 2020 6:05 AM GMT
Periyar@142-Revolutionary and Visionary
access_time 17 Sep 2020 11:57 AM GMT
The word of caution from the highest court
access_time 17 Sep 2020 6:31 AM GMT
access_time 16 Sep 2020 5:58 AM GMT
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
The ogres in the mind
access_time 8 Sep 2020 11:27 AM GMT
Why worry about populism?
access_time 4 Sep 2020 9:51 AM GMT
Media mind-set towards minorities
access_time 15 July 2020 4:29 PM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightKeralachevron_rightHC orders Canara bank...

HC orders Canara bank to give doubled compensation and job

text_fields
bookmark_border
HC orders Canara bank to give doubled compensation and job
cancel

Kochi:  Kerala High court on Tuesday dealt a body blow to Canara bank for troubling a die-in-harness job candidate for 18 years via litigation, despite two favourable orders.  

Kerala High court ordered Canara bank to pay a doubled compensation of 10 lakh and job in one month.

In response to approaching the court for third time in the same case, the court ordered the bank to pay GK Ajith Kumar a doubled compensation, and job in a month.

Following the death of Kollam native Gopalakrishnan in 2001, kin Ajith Kumar applied the bank on 2002 January for employment applicable under die-in-harness rules.

However, the bank rejected the application. Much as having a favourable order, the bank again denied the employment citing that the applicant’s age overlapped the employable age limit.

While applying, Ajithkumar was 8 months past the employable age limit of 26 years.  Approaching the court again, Ajith Kumar got another favorable order directing the bank to pay a compensation of 5 lakh and job in 2016.

When the bank again approached the court raising its old arguments, the court ordered a doubled compensation and job.

The court observed that the bank had not considered the conditions applicable to age limit in die-in-harness employment.

 

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story