Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Which direction is India heading?
access_time 2022-01-26T11:54:59+05:30
UP Elections: Is Yogis Hindu vs Muslim working?
access_time 2022-01-28T14:51:16+05:30
Is the CPI-M afraid of Lokayukta?
access_time 2022-01-28T11:15:18+05:30
Casteism in the Republic
access_time 2022-01-26T08:59:48+05:30
Is the party over for Boris Johnson?
access_time 2022-01-25T20:14:21+05:30
Online experiments of Israeli aggression
access_time 2022-01-25T10:00:57+05:30
UP Elections: Is Yogis Hindu vs Muslim working?
access_time 2022-01-28T14:51:16+05:30
Massacre in Kazakhstan
access_time 2022-01-14T16:39:12+05:30
Saudi Arabia: changing to face the future
access_time 2022-01-11T17:23:42+05:30
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC dismisses plea...

SC dismisses plea challenging validity of judges' bill

SC dismisses plea challenging validity of judges bill

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday dismissed as "premature" a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill that was passed by parliament to replace the existing collegium system for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.

While dismissing the pleas as premature, the apex court bench of Justice A.R. Dave, Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice A.K. Sikri, however, said the parties were open to move the court on the same grounds at an appropriate stage.

Appearing for the Supreme Court Bar Association, senior counsel Fali Nariman contended that the government could not have brought the NJAC Bill without first amending the constitution which is still in process and not completed.

He said that bringing a bill and passing it to replace the collegium system without there being a constitutional provision backing it, makes it invalid.

He said the NJAC Bill in its present form assailed the independence of the judiciary which is a basic structure of the constitution.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, seeking the dismissal of the batch of petitions, said they were premature and academic in nature and the court could not interfere with the NJAC Bill and the constitution amendment as it was still in the sphere of legislature.

He added that entertaining any plea in this regard would violate the principle of separation of power which was an essential feature of the constitution.

Show Full Article
Next Story