Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightDefamation case: Court ...

Defamation case: Court imposes Rs 10,000 cost on Nitin Gadkari

Defamation case: Court imposes Rs 10,000 cost on Nitin Gadkari

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Saturday imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on Union Minister Nitin Gadkari for his failure to comply with its order in a criminal defamation case filed by him against former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) Gomati Manocha observed that Mr. Gadkari had not complied with the court’s order regarding filing of an affidavit three days before the scheduled hearing today.

The court said the affidavit was to be supplied to Mr. Kejriwal’s counsel three days in advance but the same was done on Saturday only.

“In these circumstances, one last and final opportunity is being given to lead complainant evidence subject to cost of Rs. 10,000,” the magistrate said and fixed the matter for March 21, 2015.

During the hearing, senior advocate Pinki Anand, appearing for Mr. Gadkari, told the court that they have supplied the copy of the affidavit to be filed to advocate Prashant Bhushan, who has been appearing for Mr. Kejriwal on December 18.

But, advocate Rishikesh, who appeared for Mr. Kejriwal, told the court that he has been supplied the copy of the affidavit on Saturday only.

After Mr. Gadkari’s counsel told the magistrate that they have furnished the affidavit on court’s record on December 18, the magistrate said the court master was denying the same.

“The file was not taken up. How was this affidavit filed without even knowledge of this court? If you were filing an affidavit then it has to come on the record of the court. Ahlmad (court master) is denying that affidavit has been filed before him,” the magistrate said.

As the court imposed the cost on Mr. Gadkari, his counsel said it was “unfair” as the affidavit was received at Mr. Bhushan’s office on December 18 itself.

“You cannot take the court for a ride. I am saying that compliance has not been done. Do not create a ruckus in the court. The order has been passed and you can challenge it,” the magistrate told lawyers appearing for Mr. Gadkari.

The matter was listed for cross-examination of Mr. Gadkari.

Show Full Article
Next Story