Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Women and girls need to be safe
access_time 2021-01-15T15:08:45+05:30
Another Trump impeachment
access_time 2021-01-15T11:16:29+05:30
Covid 19 spread
access_time 2021-01-14T15:40:30+05:30
Freezing the Centre or the farmer protest?
access_time 2021-01-14T12:55:08+05:30
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
Anti-Conversion Law: A law meant for abuse
access_time 2021-01-12T13:56:35+05:30
Syed Shahriyaar
access_time 2021-01-05T19:08:46+05:30
Reading A week in the life of Svitlana
access_time 2020-12-23T12:06:42+05:30
Hum Dekhenge- One year of Anti-CAA protests
access_time 2020-12-22T17:35:06+05:30
The French Fanatic and the Fanatic Fringe
access_time 2020-11-02T15:56:00+05:30
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightRajiv Gandhi...

Rajiv Gandhi assassination: Apex court dismisses Nalini’s plea

text_fields
bookmark_border
Rajiv Gandhi assassination: Apex court dismisses Nalini’s plea
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday dismissed the plea of S Nalini, undergoing life imprisonment in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, challenging the law mandating the Centre’s approval for her release and that of six other convicts.

“Sorry, we are not interested,” a Bench comprising Chief Justice HL Dattu and justices MB Lokur and AK Sikri said.

Nalini had challenged Section 435(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code which mandates the state government to consult the Centre before premature release of a convict if the case was investigated by the CBI.

She has been in jail for the last 23 years and undergoing life imprisonment after her death sentence was commuted. She was sentenced to death by the trial court in the case on January 28, 1998.

Nalini’s death sentence was commuted to life term by the Tamil Nadu Governor on April 24, 2000.

“Though 2,200 life convicts who had put in less than 10 years of imprisonment were prematurely released by the Tamil Nadu Government during the last about 15 years, she was excluded from consideration for premature release only on the ground that her offence was investigated by the CBI, that is, her case was covered by Section 435(1)(a) CrPC. The said Section is unconstitutional,” her petition said.

The Centre had earlier contended that the Tamil Nadu Government can’t release the convicts without its approval and had derailed the state government’s decision to release them.

After the apex court had commuted the death sentence of convicts Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan, the Tamil Nadu government on February 19 had proposed to remit the sentences of all seven lifers, including the three, and release them.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story