Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
exit_to_app
When UAPA is invoked against fact-finding efforts
access_time 2021-11-17T18:18:11+05:30
Viral job seeker, finally appointed
access_time 2021-11-26T15:57:19+05:30
Oil market price war again
access_time 2021-11-26T09:52:25+05:30
Child smugglers should be punished
access_time 2021-11-25T12:56:54+05:30
If the fire of hatred is not extinguished
access_time 2021-11-24T09:00:53+05:30
Let police excellence be to benefit people
access_time 2021-11-23T09:49:37+05:30
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC extends house...

SC extends house arrest of HR activists, criticises cop

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC extends house arrest of HR activists, criticises cop
cancel

The Supreme Court on Thursday castigated the Maharashtra Police for addressing media on the arrests of five activists in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence case, saying a senior police officer had tried to cast aspersions on the apex court ts decision on keeping the accused under house arrest.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, however, extended the period of house arrest of the five activists till September 12.

As the court took the writ petition filed by historian Romila Thapar and others, Justice Chandrachud was livid with the Maharashtra ADGP who addressed a press conference on August 30 explaining the reasons for the crackdown on human rights activist Gautam Navlakha, lawyer Sudha Bharadwaj, poet Varavara Rao, and other activists Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves.

“He was trying to make insinuations that what the SC did was wrong. You can't cast aspersions on Supreme Court like this. He was addressing the press conference and ruining the reputation of people,” Justice Chandrachud said. “You must tell your officer to be more responsible,” Justice Chandrachud told Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who apologised on behalf of the officer.

Senior advocate Harish Salve, representing complainant Tushar Gangude, questioned the locus standi of the petitioners, historian Thapar and others, in a criminal matter. Mehta contended that the activists have themselves explored alternative remedy. He also submitted that keeping the activists under house arrest would hamper the probe.

Senior advocate Abhishek M Singhvi, representing the petitioners, pointed out that one of the petitioners, Satish Deshpande, has been authorised by the activists to represent them and treat the instant writ petition as their own. “The matter has to be argued with legal parameters,” the bench said, extending the house arrest of activists till Wednesday.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story