Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Points to ponder before the Al-Qaeda hunt
access_time 22 Sep 2020 6:25 AM GMT
Farmer rage and Opposition parties
access_time 19 Sep 2020 6:51 AM GMT
access_time 19 Sep 2020 3:50 AM GMT
Going beyond birthday celebration
access_time 18 Sep 2020 6:05 AM GMT
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
The ogres in the mind
access_time 8 Sep 2020 11:27 AM GMT
Why worry about populism?
access_time 4 Sep 2020 9:51 AM GMT
Media mind-set towards minorities
access_time 15 July 2020 4:29 PM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC junks PIL seeking...

SC junks PIL seeking to debar candidates with more than 2 children from electoral fray

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC junks PIL seeking to debar candidates with more than 2 children from electoral fray
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking directions to the Election Commission to mandate the recognised political parties to not field candidates with more than two children, wondering how a "constitutional court can say that if you have more than two children, you can't contest election".

The petitioner had also sought that the two-child norm be made a criterion for getting government jobs, subsidies and other benefits to check population explosion.

An unimpressed bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna asked how could they say that a person having more than two children should not be fielded as a candidate by recognised political parties, wondering if saying so was a proportionate judicial order.

"How can this court say that someone who has more than two children should not be allowed to contest from a recognised political part? Is it a proportionate judicial order?" CJI Gogoi asked as the court dismissed the PIL filed by advocate and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

The court also flagged the issue of the propriety, legality and jurisdiction to pass such an order.

However, the court dismissed the PIL as withdrawn after Upadhyay told the bench that he has made representations to the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Chief Election Commissioner on the issue.

Having been ducked on the issue of barring candidates with more than two children from the electoral fray, the petitioner raised the issue of different marriageable age for girls and boys, which is 18 and 21, respectively, and pointed to gender justice and gender equality.

But the unimpressed court asked Upadhyay how could he combine the two issues - barring candidates with more than two children and different marriageable age for boys and girls. "You have moved from the Election Commission to the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act," the court said.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story