Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Going beyond birthday celebration
access_time 18 Sep 2020 6:05 AM GMT
Periyar@142-Revolutionary and Visionary
access_time 17 Sep 2020 11:57 AM GMT
The word of caution from the highest court
access_time 17 Sep 2020 6:31 AM GMT
access_time 16 Sep 2020 5:58 AM GMT
access_time 15 Sep 2020 6:19 AM GMT
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
The ogres in the mind
access_time 8 Sep 2020 11:27 AM GMT
Why worry about populism?
access_time 4 Sep 2020 9:51 AM GMT
Media mind-set towards minorities
access_time 15 July 2020 4:29 PM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightEviction of tribals...

Eviction of tribals holding forest land put on hold

text_fields
bookmark_border
Eviction of tribals holding forest land put on hold
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday put on hold its own order directing eviction of tribals, including forest dwellers whose claim over the forest land was rejected.

Asking states to file details of procedure followed for rejecting the tribals' claims, a bench of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Navin Sinha and Justice M.R. Shah put on hold its own February 13 order directing eviction of tribals in unauthorised possession of forest land.

It also pulled up the Centre for going into slumber and then suddenly approaching the bench advancing the tribals rights.

Saying the entire exercise "can't be left in the lurch", the court said that those who are not in authorised possession of forest land must go.

However, it made it clear that "mighty people" must not "encroach upon forest land under the guise of Scheduled Tribes and other forest dwellers".

When Solicitor General Tushar Mehta pleaded that there was no procedure for accepting or rejecting claims, Justice Sinha pointed to Section 9 and 10 of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

He told Mehta that there was a detailed procedure for deciding the claim over forest land, including review of the decision including appeal against it.

When lawyers representing states pleaded that they should be allowed to file sample orders of rejection and eviction as the cases could go into lakhs, the apex bench said that states must file response in all the cases of rejection.

The apex court reiterating its February 13 order asked the Forest Survey of India to undertake a satellite survey of forest lands.

That order was applicable for the forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers whose claims were rejected under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story