Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
keyboard_arrow_down
Login
exit_to_app
Points to ponder before the Al-Qaeda hunt
access_time 22 Sep 2020 6:25 AM GMT
Farmer rage and Opposition parties
access_time 19 Sep 2020 6:51 AM GMT
access_time 19 Sep 2020 3:50 AM GMT
Going beyond birthday celebration
access_time 18 Sep 2020 6:05 AM GMT
DEEP READAll arrow_drop_down
The ogres in the mind
access_time 8 Sep 2020 11:27 AM GMT
Why worry about populism?
access_time 4 Sep 2020 9:51 AM GMT
Media mind-set towards minorities
access_time 15 July 2020 4:29 PM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC junks PIL seeking...

SC junks PIL seeking 100% verification of VVPAT slips

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC junks PIL seeking 100% verification of VVPAT slips
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a PIL which sought 100 per cent verification of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips with the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) during the counting of votes on May 23 for the recently held Lok Sabha elections.

The plea was been filed by Tech for All, a Chennai-based organisation.

A vacation bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra, dismissed the plea observing that a larger bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi had already conducted a detailed hearing in the matter and passed an order.

The court pulled up the petitioner asking why had his plea been brought before a vacation bench when the CJI had already dealt with the matter. "This is nonsense. We cannot override the CJI's order....The petition is taken on board. Dismissed," said Justice Arun Mishra.

On April 8, an apex court bench headed by the CJI, directed the Election Commission (EC) to increase random matching of VVPAT slips with EVMs from one to five machines at polling booths per Assembly segment in the general elections.

The court observed that the increase in the number would provide greater satisfaction to the electorate as well as the political parties.

On May 7, the top court dismissed a petition filed by 21 Opposition parties to review its April judgment.

Show Full Article
TAGS:
Next Story