Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
exit_to_app
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC terms courts...

SC terms courts deciding rape cases in haste as 'disturbing trend'

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC terms courts deciding rape cases in haste as disturbing trend
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern over the "disturbing tendency" of trial courts passing order of conviction and sentence on the same day in criminal cases involving murder and rape, without allowing the accused a chance to argue on quantum of punishment

The statement from the apex court came as it commuted the death sentence of a man, convicted for raping and killing a 11-year-old girl to 30 years imprisonment.

A bench, headed by Justice L. Nageswara Rao and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna, said: "It is travesty of justice as the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself. This is a classic case indicating the disturbing tendency of trial courts adjudicating criminal cases involving rape and murder in haste. It is trite law that an accused is entitled for a fair trial which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution."

Noting that the trial court passed the order of conviction and sentence on the same day, Justice Rao, who authored the judgment on behalf of the bench, said: "The object and purpose of Section 235 (2) CrPC is that the accused must be given an opportunity to make a representation against the sentence to be imposed on him."

The bench added that the accused should be provided with adequate opportunity to produce relevant material on the question of death sentence.

The judgment came on an appeal filed by Bhagwani, whose appeal challenging the death sentence awarded by the trial court was dismissed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

The top court noted that the accused was 25 years old on the date of commission of the offence and belongs to a Scheduled Tribes community, eking his livelihood by doing manual labour. It added that no evidence has been placed by the prosecution on record to show that there is no probability of rehabilitation and reformation of the accused and the question of an alternative option to death sentence is foreclosed.

However, considering the barbaric and savage manner of the crime and the tender age of the victim who was suffocated to death, the bench directed the appellant to remain in jail for 30 years without remission.

The incident occurred in April 2017 and the other accused Satish died during the pendency of his appeal.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme court 
Next Story